Continual Improvement In The Quality Management System
The ISO 9001 standard requires the organization to continually improve the effectiveness of the quality management system in accordance with the requirements of ISO 9001 and to implement action necessary to achieve planned results and continual improvement of the identified processes.
ISO 9000 defines continual improvement as a recurring activity to increase the ability to fulfil requirements. As the organization’s objectives are its requirements, continually improving the effectiveness of the quality management system means continually increasing the ability of the organization to fulfil its objectives.
If the performance of a process parameter is currently meeting the standard that has been established, there are several improvement actions you can take:
Raise the standard e.g. if the norm for the sales ratio of orders won to all orders bid is 60%, an improvement programme could be developed for raising the standard to 75% or higher
Increase efficiency e.g. if the time to process an order is within limits, identify and eliminate wasted resources
Increase effectiveness e.g. if you bid against all customer requests, by only bidding for those you know you can win you improve your hit rate
You can call all these actions improvement actions because they clearly improve performance. However, we need to distinguish between being better at what we do now and doing new things. Some may argue that improving efficiency is being better at what we do now, and so it is – but if in order to improve efficiency we have to be innovative we are truly reaching new standards. Forty years ago, supervisors in industry would cut an eraser in half in the name of efficiency rather than hand out two erasers. Clearly this was a lack of trust disguised as efficiency improvement and it had quite the opposite effect. In fact they were not only increasing waste but also creating a hostile environment.
Each of the improvement actions is dealt with later in the book and the subject of continual improvement addressed again under Quality planning.
There are several steps to undertaking continual improvement:
1. Determine current performance
2 Establish the need for change
3 Obtain commitment and define the improvement objectives
4 Organize diagnostic resources
5 Carry out research and analysis to discover the cause of current performance
6 Define and test solutions that will accomplish the improvement objectives
7 Product improvement plans which specify how and by whom the changes will be implemented
8 Identify and overcome any resistance to change
9 Implement the change
10 Put in place controls to hold new levels of performance and repeat step one
For more information, please visit http://www.iso9001-standard.us
Showing posts with label Quality Management System. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Quality Management System. Show all posts
Wednesday, September 30, 2009
Scope Of The Quality Management System
Scope Of The Quality Management System
The ISO 9001 standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion. The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9001:2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because it operated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the quality management system.
It is sensible to describe the scope of the quality management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the quality management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor. Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical to justify inclusions.
The scope of the quality management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’.
It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable.
For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.
The ISO 9001 standard requires the quality manual to include the scope of the quality management system including details of justification for any exclusion. The standard addresses activities that may not be relevant or applicable to an organization. The permissible exclusions are explained in section 1.2 of ISO 9001. Here it states that the organization may only exclude requirements that neither affect the organization’s ability, nor its responsibility to provide product that meets customer and applicable regulatory requirements. The requirements for which exclusion is permitted are limited to those in section 7 of the standard.
Under ISO 9001:2008, it was possible for organizations to exclude functions and processes of their organization that may have been difficult to control or were not part of the order fulfilment cycle. Organizations that designed their own products but not for specific customers could escape bringing these operations into the management system. Marketing was omitted because it operated before placement of order. Accounting, Administration, Maintenance, Publicity, Public Relations and After Sales Support functions were often omitted because there were no requirements in the standard that specifically dealt with such activities. As there is no function in an organization that does not directly or indirectly serve the satisfaction of interested parties, it is unlikely that any function or process will now be excluded from the quality management system.
It is sensible to describe the scope of the quality management system so as to ensure effective communication. The scope of the quality management system is one area that generates a lot of misunderstanding particularly when dealing with auditors, consultants and customers. When you claim you have a management system that meets ISO 9001 it could imply that you design, develop, install and service the products you supply, when in fact you may only be a distributor. Why you need to justify specific exclusions is uncertain because it is more practical to justify inclusions.
The scope of the quality management system is the scope of the organization. There is no longer any reason to exclude locations, activities, functions or processes for which there is no requirement in the standard. The reason is because the ISO 9000 family now serves customer satisfaction and is not limited to quality assurance as were the 1994 versions of ISO 9001, ISO 9002 and ISO 9003.
It is not appropriate to address exclusions by inserting pages in the manual corresponding to the sections of the standard and adding justification if not within the scope of the management system – such as ‘We don’t do this!’.
It is much more appropriate to use an appendix as indicated previously in the manual contents list. By describing the nature of the business, you are establishing boundary conditions. If in doing so you do not mention that you design products, it will be interpreted that design is not applicable.
For exclusions relative to detail requirements, the Compliance Matrix may suffice but for an unambiguous solution, it is preferable to produce an exposition that addresses each requirement of the standard.
Monday, September 14, 2009
ISO 9001:2008 FAQ
ISO 9001:2008 FAQ
What Is The ISO 9001: 2008 Standard?
The latest edition of the ISO 9001 standard ISO 9001: 2008, Quality Management Systems – Requirements, was officially published by (ISO) the International Organization for Standardization on November 14, 2008. It is the fourth edition of the ISO 9001 standard since it was first published in 1987.
Who Is Responsible For Revising The standards?
The ISO Technical Committee no.176, Sub-committee no.2 (ISO/TC 176/SC 2) is responsible for the revision process in collaboration with consensus among quality and industry experts nominated by ISO Member bodies, and representing all interested parties.
Does ISO 9001:2008 Have Additional Requirements Beyond ISO 9001:2000 ?
This latest (4th) edition of ISO 9001 contains no new requirements compared to the (3rd) year 2000 edition, which it replaces. What it does is provide clarification to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 based on eight years’ experience of worldwide implementing of the standard and introduces changes intended to improve consistency with the environmental management system standard, ISO 14001:2004.
The clarifications and changes in ISO 9001:2008 represents fine-tuning, rather than a thorough overhaul. It focuses on changes that organizations might make to better comply with the spirit of the standard without adding, deleting, or altering its requirements. The changes are minor in nature and address such issues as the need to clarify, provide greater consistency, resolve perceived ambiguities, and improve compatibility with ISO 14001. The numbering system and the structure of the standard remain unchanged. As a result, the new standard looks much like the old standard.
ISO has grouped the changes incorporated in this ISO 9001:2008 edition into the following categories:- No changes or minimum changes on user documents, including records- No changes or minimum changes to existing QMS processes- No additional training required or minimal training required- No effects on current certifications
In contrast, the 3rd edition, ISO 9001:2000 published in 2000, represented a major overhaul of the standard, including new requirements and a sharpened customer focus, reflecting developments in quality management and experience gained since the publication of the initial version.
Then Why Was It Necessary To Introduce This Revision?All ISO standards – currently more than 17 400 – are periodically reviewed. To ensure that ISO standards are maintained at the state of the art, ISO has a rule requiring them to be periodically reviewed and a decision taken to confirm, withdraw or revise the documents. The review process must be initiated within 3 years of publication of a standard. The review considers several factors such as technological evolution, new methods and materials, new quality and safety requirements, or questions of interpretation and application.
The review of ISO 9001 resulting in the 2008 edition was carried out by subcommittee SC 2 of ISO/TC 176. This subcommittee, which is responsible for the ISO 9000 family, unites expertise from 80 participating countries and 19 international or regional organizations, plus other technical committees.
This review has a number of inputs that help it:
A global user questionnaire/survey
A market Justification Study
Suggestions arising from the ISO/TC 176 interpretation process
Opportunities for increased compatibility with ISO 14001
The need for greater clarity, ease of use, and improved translation
Current trends – keeping up with recent developments in management system practices.
How Does The New ISO 9001 Edition Affect Existing ISO 9001 QMS’s?
As organizations start looking at ISO 9001:2008, they will wonder to what extent the changes might affect them. To a large extent, the new standard will not result in significant change to existing quality management systems (QMS).
ISO/TC 176 was careful in not making change for change sake. In the case of editorial changes, this was especially true. This could have lead to a false impression that there was a change in requirements, carrying greater significance than was intended. In those instances, when the committee members couldn’t come to a consensus in determining if a change added or deleted a requirement, they opted to retain the existing text. They decided it was better to err on the side of caution rather than to contribute to any misunderstanding in the marketplace.
The changes that have been incorporated into this edition of the ISO 9001 standard include changes that should lead to a better understanding across a broader range of product types, including service organizations; use of deliberate wording to minimize the potential for incorrect user interpretation; and reflect nuances of similar concepts. Lastly, some of the changes to specific clauses were made based on the 2004 International User Feedback Survey. This survey was conducted after the publication of ISO 9001:2000 and had invited respondents to identify areas they most wanted to see improved.
What Is The ISO 9001: 2008 Standard?
The latest edition of the ISO 9001 standard ISO 9001: 2008, Quality Management Systems – Requirements, was officially published by (ISO) the International Organization for Standardization on November 14, 2008. It is the fourth edition of the ISO 9001 standard since it was first published in 1987.
Who Is Responsible For Revising The standards?
The ISO Technical Committee no.176, Sub-committee no.2 (ISO/TC 176/SC 2) is responsible for the revision process in collaboration with consensus among quality and industry experts nominated by ISO Member bodies, and representing all interested parties.
Does ISO 9001:2008 Have Additional Requirements Beyond ISO 9001:2000 ?
This latest (4th) edition of ISO 9001 contains no new requirements compared to the (3rd) year 2000 edition, which it replaces. What it does is provide clarification to the existing requirements of ISO 9001:2000 based on eight years’ experience of worldwide implementing of the standard and introduces changes intended to improve consistency with the environmental management system standard, ISO 14001:2004.
The clarifications and changes in ISO 9001:2008 represents fine-tuning, rather than a thorough overhaul. It focuses on changes that organizations might make to better comply with the spirit of the standard without adding, deleting, or altering its requirements. The changes are minor in nature and address such issues as the need to clarify, provide greater consistency, resolve perceived ambiguities, and improve compatibility with ISO 14001. The numbering system and the structure of the standard remain unchanged. As a result, the new standard looks much like the old standard.
ISO has grouped the changes incorporated in this ISO 9001:2008 edition into the following categories:- No changes or minimum changes on user documents, including records- No changes or minimum changes to existing QMS processes- No additional training required or minimal training required- No effects on current certifications
In contrast, the 3rd edition, ISO 9001:2000 published in 2000, represented a major overhaul of the standard, including new requirements and a sharpened customer focus, reflecting developments in quality management and experience gained since the publication of the initial version.
Then Why Was It Necessary To Introduce This Revision?All ISO standards – currently more than 17 400 – are periodically reviewed. To ensure that ISO standards are maintained at the state of the art, ISO has a rule requiring them to be periodically reviewed and a decision taken to confirm, withdraw or revise the documents. The review process must be initiated within 3 years of publication of a standard. The review considers several factors such as technological evolution, new methods and materials, new quality and safety requirements, or questions of interpretation and application.
The review of ISO 9001 resulting in the 2008 edition was carried out by subcommittee SC 2 of ISO/TC 176. This subcommittee, which is responsible for the ISO 9000 family, unites expertise from 80 participating countries and 19 international or regional organizations, plus other technical committees.
This review has a number of inputs that help it:
A global user questionnaire/survey
A market Justification Study
Suggestions arising from the ISO/TC 176 interpretation process
Opportunities for increased compatibility with ISO 14001
The need for greater clarity, ease of use, and improved translation
Current trends – keeping up with recent developments in management system practices.
How Does The New ISO 9001 Edition Affect Existing ISO 9001 QMS’s?
As organizations start looking at ISO 9001:2008, they will wonder to what extent the changes might affect them. To a large extent, the new standard will not result in significant change to existing quality management systems (QMS).
ISO/TC 176 was careful in not making change for change sake. In the case of editorial changes, this was especially true. This could have lead to a false impression that there was a change in requirements, carrying greater significance than was intended. In those instances, when the committee members couldn’t come to a consensus in determining if a change added or deleted a requirement, they opted to retain the existing text. They decided it was better to err on the side of caution rather than to contribute to any misunderstanding in the marketplace.
The changes that have been incorporated into this edition of the ISO 9001 standard include changes that should lead to a better understanding across a broader range of product types, including service organizations; use of deliberate wording to minimize the potential for incorrect user interpretation; and reflect nuances of similar concepts. Lastly, some of the changes to specific clauses were made based on the 2004 International User Feedback Survey. This survey was conducted after the publication of ISO 9001:2000 and had invited respondents to identify areas they most wanted to see improved.
Update on ISO 9001:2008
Update on ISO 9001:2008
Following a recent meeting of ISO’s Technical Committee TC176 in Helsinki, Finland, from June
11 – 15t, 2007, publication of the new version of ISO 9001 has been brought forward from 2009
and is now scheduled to be published in October 2008. Experts representing over 70 ISO member
bodies, met to discuss the comments received during circulation of the Committee Draft (”CD”) of
the new standard, and concluded that in view of the very limited changes being proposed, the draft
is now sufficiently mature to progress directly to the DIS (Draft International Standard).
The main changes being introduced into the new standard are as follows:
Clause 0.2 (Process approach)
Text added to emphasize the importance of processes being capable of achieving desired outputs
Clause 1.1 (Scope)
Clarification that “product” also includes intermediate product
Explanation regarding statutory, regulatory and legal requirements
Clause 4.1 (General requirements)
Notes added to explain more about outsourcing
Types of control that may be applied to outsourced processes
Relationship to clause 7.4 (Purchasing)
Clarification that outsourced processes are still responsibility of the organization and must be
included in the quality management system
Clause 4.2.1 (Documentation)
Clarification that QMS documentation also includes records
Documents required by the standard may be combined
ISO 9001 requirements may be covered by more than one documented procedure
Clause 4.2.3 (Document control)
Clarification that only external documents relevant to the QMS need to be controlled
Clause 4.2.4 (Records control)
Editorial changes only (better alignment with ISO 14001)
Clause 5.5.2 (Management rep)
Clarifies that this must be a member of the organization’s own management
Clause 6.2.1 (Human resources)
Clarification that competence requirements are relevant for any personnel who are involved in the
operation of the quality management system
Clause 6.3 (Infrastructure)
Includes information systems as example
Clause 6.4 (Work environment)
Clarifies that this includes conditions under which work is performed and includes, for example
physical, environmental and other factors such as noise, temperature, humidity, lighting, or weather
Clause 7.2.1 (Customer related processes)
Clarifies that post-delivery activities may include:
- Actions under warranty provisions
- Contractual obligations such as maintenance services
- Supplementary services such as recycling or final disposal
Clause 7.3.1 (Design & development planning)
Clarifies that design and development review, verification and validation have distinct purposes
These may be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination as suitable for the product
and the organization
Clause 7.3.3(Design & development outputs)
Clarifies that information needed for production and service provision includes preservation of the product
Clause 7.5.4 (Customer property)
Explains that both intellectual property and personal data should be considered as customer property
Clause 7.6 (Now retitled Control of Monitoring and Measuring equipment)
Explanatory notes added regarding the use of computer software: “Confirmation of the ability of computer software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.”
Clause 8.2.1 (Customer satisfaction)
Note added to explain that monitoring of customer perception may include input from sources such as customer satisfaction surveys, customer data on delivered product quality, user opinion surveys, lost business analysis, compliments, and dealer reports
Clause 8.2.3 (Monitoring / Measurement of process)
Note added to clarify that when deciding on appropriate methods, the organization should consider impact on the conformity to product requirements and on the effectiveness of the quality management system.
Following a recent meeting of ISO’s Technical Committee TC176 in Helsinki, Finland, from June
11 – 15t, 2007, publication of the new version of ISO 9001 has been brought forward from 2009
and is now scheduled to be published in October 2008. Experts representing over 70 ISO member
bodies, met to discuss the comments received during circulation of the Committee Draft (”CD”) of
the new standard, and concluded that in view of the very limited changes being proposed, the draft
is now sufficiently mature to progress directly to the DIS (Draft International Standard).
The main changes being introduced into the new standard are as follows:
Clause 0.2 (Process approach)
Text added to emphasize the importance of processes being capable of achieving desired outputs
Clause 1.1 (Scope)
Clarification that “product” also includes intermediate product
Explanation regarding statutory, regulatory and legal requirements
Clause 4.1 (General requirements)
Notes added to explain more about outsourcing
Types of control that may be applied to outsourced processes
Relationship to clause 7.4 (Purchasing)
Clarification that outsourced processes are still responsibility of the organization and must be
included in the quality management system
Clause 4.2.1 (Documentation)
Clarification that QMS documentation also includes records
Documents required by the standard may be combined
ISO 9001 requirements may be covered by more than one documented procedure
Clause 4.2.3 (Document control)
Clarification that only external documents relevant to the QMS need to be controlled
Clause 4.2.4 (Records control)
Editorial changes only (better alignment with ISO 14001)
Clause 5.5.2 (Management rep)
Clarifies that this must be a member of the organization’s own management
Clause 6.2.1 (Human resources)
Clarification that competence requirements are relevant for any personnel who are involved in the
operation of the quality management system
Clause 6.3 (Infrastructure)
Includes information systems as example
Clause 6.4 (Work environment)
Clarifies that this includes conditions under which work is performed and includes, for example
physical, environmental and other factors such as noise, temperature, humidity, lighting, or weather
Clause 7.2.1 (Customer related processes)
Clarifies that post-delivery activities may include:
- Actions under warranty provisions
- Contractual obligations such as maintenance services
- Supplementary services such as recycling or final disposal
Clause 7.3.1 (Design & development planning)
Clarifies that design and development review, verification and validation have distinct purposes
These may be conducted and recorded separately or in any combination as suitable for the product
and the organization
Clause 7.3.3(Design & development outputs)
Clarifies that information needed for production and service provision includes preservation of the product
Clause 7.5.4 (Customer property)
Explains that both intellectual property and personal data should be considered as customer property
Clause 7.6 (Now retitled Control of Monitoring and Measuring equipment)
Explanatory notes added regarding the use of computer software: “Confirmation of the ability of computer software to satisfy the intended application would typically include its verification and configuration management to maintain its suitability for use.”
Clause 8.2.1 (Customer satisfaction)
Note added to explain that monitoring of customer perception may include input from sources such as customer satisfaction surveys, customer data on delivered product quality, user opinion surveys, lost business analysis, compliments, and dealer reports
Clause 8.2.3 (Monitoring / Measurement of process)
Note added to clarify that when deciding on appropriate methods, the organization should consider impact on the conformity to product requirements and on the effectiveness of the quality management system.
ISO 9001 Standards – Document Repository
ISO 9001 Standards - Document Repository
All QMS and product realization documents can be stored electronically within the computerize Document Management System like ISO 9001 Document Control Sytem. This provides a set of category and sub-category headings that enable users to drill down intothe different levels of the documentation category tree.QMS documents are created and maintained within a top level category entitled “ISO 9001 Quality Management System (QMS)“. Documents in this category follow a 4-tier approach:• Quality Manual – company scope and process interactions within the QMS• Quality Procedures – responsibilities, controls and activities within the QMS that effect customer service• Records – objective evidence to demonstrate our goal in achieving customer satisfaction• Forms & Reports to support the QMS processesProduct realization documents are stored in categories corresponding to Products, Projects and Departments. Each document is unique, but can be accessed from multiple categories.Documents created within the FablessSemi Inc CogniDox system are assigned a unique identifier using the format “PO-NNNNNN-XX”; where the “PO” prefix identifies them as FablessSemi Inc documents, the “NNNNNN” is an automatically generated and uniquely assigned numerical ID, and the “XX” suffix indicates the document type.All Fabless Semi Inc personnel are responsible for creating document part numbers and uploading documents to an appropriate category. Selected users with additional system privileges are responsible for creating and maintaining document categories.
All QMS and product realization documents can be stored electronically within the computerize Document Management System like ISO 9001 Document Control Sytem. This provides a set of category and sub-category headings that enable users to drill down intothe different levels of the documentation category tree.QMS documents are created and maintained within a top level category entitled “ISO 9001 Quality Management System (QMS)“. Documents in this category follow a 4-tier approach:• Quality Manual – company scope and process interactions within the QMS• Quality Procedures – responsibilities, controls and activities within the QMS that effect customer service• Records – objective evidence to demonstrate our goal in achieving customer satisfaction• Forms & Reports to support the QMS processesProduct realization documents are stored in categories corresponding to Products, Projects and Departments. Each document is unique, but can be accessed from multiple categories.Documents created within the FablessSemi Inc CogniDox system are assigned a unique identifier using the format “PO-NNNNNN-XX”; where the “PO” prefix identifies them as FablessSemi Inc documents, the “NNNNNN” is an automatically generated and uniquely assigned numerical ID, and the “XX” suffix indicates the document type.All Fabless Semi Inc personnel are responsible for creating document part numbers and uploading documents to an appropriate category. Selected users with additional system privileges are responsible for creating and maintaining document categories.
Wednesday, September 9, 2009
Process Approach In ISO 9001 Standards
Process Approach In ISO 9001 Standards
The process approach was introduced into ISO 9001 with the year 2000 version of the standards.Prior versions used an element approach. The document Guidance on the concept and use of the process approach for management systems describes to process approach and offers an implementation paradigm.1. Identification of processes of the organization1.1. Define the purpose of the organization1.2. Define the policies and objectives of the organization1.3. Determine the processes in the organization1.4. Determine the sequence of the processes1.5. Define process ownership1.6. Define process documentation2. Planning of a process2.1. Define the activities within the process2.2. Define the monitoring and measurement requirements2.3. Define the resources needed
2.4. Verify the process and its activities against its planned objectives3. Implementation and measurement of the process4. Analysis of the process5. Corrective action and improvement of the process ImplementationThis document explains the process used to evaluate changes to the 2008 version. In particular, it explains the revision process and illustrates the impact vs. benefit analysis used to evaluate potential changes.In addition to the guidance documents, ISO maintains a web site with “official interpretations” of ISO 9001. Currently, these interpretations only include ISO 9001:2000, but, because the changes to the 2008 version were limited, they are valuable.Consider a common question. An organization needs a documented procedure for preventive action (8.5.3), and must keep records of the results of preventive action (8.5.3.d). One of the interpretation requests asks, “Does sub-clause 8.5.3 a) require organizations to demonstrate, with objective evidence in the form of records, that they have undertaken actions to determine the existence of ‘potential nonconformities and their causes’?” The answer is “No”.Auditing PracticesThe ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group maintains a website9 with guidance and information on auditing ISO 9001 quality management systems. It is an informal group of quality management system (QMS) experts, auditors, and practitioners drawn from the ISO Technical Committee 176 Quality Management and Quality Assurance (ISO/TC 176) and the International Accreditation Forum (IAF).The website, primarily aimed at QMS auditors, consultants, and quality practitioners, is an online source of papers and presentations on auditing a QMS and reflect the process based approach.The website contains almost forty guidance documents with practical advice ranging from “How to audit top management processes” to “The role and value of the audit checklist”.
The process approach was introduced into ISO 9001 with the year 2000 version of the standards.Prior versions used an element approach. The document Guidance on the concept and use of the process approach for management systems describes to process approach and offers an implementation paradigm.1. Identification of processes of the organization1.1. Define the purpose of the organization1.2. Define the policies and objectives of the organization1.3. Determine the processes in the organization1.4. Determine the sequence of the processes1.5. Define process ownership1.6. Define process documentation2. Planning of a process2.1. Define the activities within the process2.2. Define the monitoring and measurement requirements2.3. Define the resources needed
2.4. Verify the process and its activities against its planned objectives3. Implementation and measurement of the process4. Analysis of the process5. Corrective action and improvement of the process ImplementationThis document explains the process used to evaluate changes to the 2008 version. In particular, it explains the revision process and illustrates the impact vs. benefit analysis used to evaluate potential changes.In addition to the guidance documents, ISO maintains a web site with “official interpretations” of ISO 9001. Currently, these interpretations only include ISO 9001:2000, but, because the changes to the 2008 version were limited, they are valuable.Consider a common question. An organization needs a documented procedure for preventive action (8.5.3), and must keep records of the results of preventive action (8.5.3.d). One of the interpretation requests asks, “Does sub-clause 8.5.3 a) require organizations to demonstrate, with objective evidence in the form of records, that they have undertaken actions to determine the existence of ‘potential nonconformities and their causes’?” The answer is “No”.Auditing PracticesThe ISO 9001 Auditing Practices Group maintains a website9 with guidance and information on auditing ISO 9001 quality management systems. It is an informal group of quality management system (QMS) experts, auditors, and practitioners drawn from the ISO Technical Committee 176 Quality Management and Quality Assurance (ISO/TC 176) and the International Accreditation Forum (IAF).The website, primarily aimed at QMS auditors, consultants, and quality practitioners, is an online source of papers and presentations on auditing a QMS and reflect the process based approach.The website contains almost forty guidance documents with practical advice ranging from “How to audit top management processes” to “The role and value of the audit checklist”.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)